Angels in Blake, by Mia Forbes

Unfolding Emissaries:  Angels and Devils as Dialectic

Screen Shot 2021-11-24 at 18.46.59

Screen Shot 2021-11-24 at 10.09.19-Blake

Screen Shot 2021-11-24 at 11.59.31

Screen Shot 2021-11-24 at 18.36.22 (1)

Just as Blake believed that angels are inter-relational and can interpenetrate many dimensions, a part of the divine fabric that constitutes human imagination and an extended field of gravity-like attraction and connection (“betweenness”), this piece weaves together the thought of three different but interrelated Blake commentators on angels – Mia Forbes, S. Foster Damon, and Northrop Frye – thus hoping to build, in a sense, the wings of mutual communion and flight, ones which constitute the true or ‘best’ sense of the angelic in Blake: wings enfolded within wings.

“Angel” is the Greek word for “messenger” or “emissary”.  Blake used the word in the specific sense only once, in expanding Matthew 1:20, where the Angel of the Lord appears to Joseph in a dream, bidding him marry Mary. In the Bible it is not always easy to be sure whether God himself may not be intended by the word. Blake combined the two: “I heard his voice in my sleep & his Angel in my dream” (Jerusalem). But anything that speaks of Eternity may be an angel; thus the tiny skylark is “a Mighty Angel” (Milton: 12; cf.L’Allegro).

“Every man’s leading propensity ought to be call’d his leading Virtue & his good Angel” (Blake, On Lavater). Blake had one (see ‘A Dream’, Songs of Innocence; or “The Angel that presided o’er my birth”, from Blake’s Notebook 1808-26); Milton had one (Milton); also the unfortunate heroine of ‘The Angel’ (Songs of Experience). Angels guard children and give them sleep (‘Night’, and ‘A Cradle Song’, Songs of Innocence).

Screen Shot 2021-11-24 at 11.55.39

The Annunciation to the Shepherds, from Blake’s Illustrations to Milton’s ‘On the Morning of Christ’s Nativity’ (1809). This is the angel as herald, signifying the “intimations” or implicit revelations that accompany poetry and prophecy.

 

Screen Shot 2021-11-24 at 20.49.38 (1)

Mary at Her Distaff Watched Over by Two Angels, from Blake’s Illustrations to Milton’s ‘Paradise Regained’ (c. 1816-20). Blake’s angels often come in twos, as we’ll see, denoting the binary nature of the human soul. Man is a “twofold” being, as Blake, Buber, and McGilchrist all suggest.

 

Screen Shot 2021-11-24 at 11.53.24

“Anything that speaks of Eternity may be an angel; thus the tiny skylark is ‘a Mighty Angel’.” Image: Night Startled by the Lark, from Blake’s Illustrations to Milton’s ‘L’Allegro’ and ‘Il Penseroso’ (c. 1816-20). Anything that mediates domains can be a messenger or ‘angel’: a skylark, a poet, a computer programmer, or an annunciation. Angels and daemons are not that rare in a world so heavily “trans”. Other words for them in a more personal or morphogenetic sense are ‘spirits’ or ‘geniuses’ (from which we also get the words ‘genetics’ or ‘genes’, vast formative powers or fields). The Greek word for “guardian spirit” was daemon, which Shelley translates as “intermediary spirit”. For Blake, “Genius” (or “Poetic Genius”) has contours: it is constantly shaping this moment, and this moment, and this sentence, in this particular way, in its own image and according to its own identity (or “principle of its own integrity” in Shelley’s precise phrase). It is a style, a particular way of being, for each being. And because being is dialectic, or fundamentally polar and “contrary”, these spirits are split, or rather have two aspects or poles.

Screen Shot 2021-05-10 at 10.39.26

Introduction: Angels and Devils as Dialectic

Screen Shot 2021-11-24 at 18.33.59

“Blake held that organic opposites are at their healthiest and most effective when yoked together in dynamic union” Image: The Angels hovering over the Body of Christ in the Sepulchre (1805)

The poetry of William Blake is a study in contraries without contradictions. His verse rests on the fine balance of opposites, with the tension between divergent forces, such as good and evil, male and female, Innocence and Experience, playing a vital role in his work. And yet Blake abhorred the division of natural contraries into rigid dichotomies, the most reprehensible being the attempt to identify good and evil as separate features of the human soul, and to suppress the latter. To purge an entity of one part of a vital pairing eliminates any chance of harmony, offering only bleak uniformity. Like Jung’s syzygy, Blake held that organic opposites are at their healthiest and most effective when yoked together in dynamic union.

Just as antithetical properties meet in a single entity, so too can a single entity convey a multitude of meaning. Motifs, symbols and analogies are not something that can be relied upon in the Blakean corpus, since they are liable to change without warning and without explanation. In one poem, even in one line, gold may represent prosperity and success, while in another it quickly becomes a mark of avarice and entrapment. Among the most complex figures in Blake’s oeuvre is the angel. Angels appear again and again in both his poetry and prose, often in antithetical roles.

Screen Shot 2021-05-10 at 10.39.26

The Angels of Innocence

Screen Shot 2021-11-24 at 12.15.25

Detail from The Good and Evil Angels (1795), suggesting the protective and guardian aspect of the angelic

On the one hand, they are guardians who offer protection, inspiration and a pathway towards God. In Songs of Innocence (1789), one angel guards the bed of a sleeping child, while another liberates a group of young chimney sweeps: “Then down a green plain leaping, laughing, they run, / And wash in a river, and shine in the sun.” They play a similar role in The Couch of Death, one of the pieces of prose-poetry published in Blake’s first collection, Poetical Sketches (1783). “The sorrowful pair lift up their heads, hovering Angels are around them, voices of comfort are heard over the Couch of Death, and the youth breathes out his soul with joy into eternity.” The simplicity and purity of such imagery conforms with the reader’s preconceived idea of an angel, watching over the innocent and warding off evil.

Likewise in the epic poem, Milton (1800-04), “each [thing] has its Guard, each Moment, Minute, Hour, Day, Month and Year … The Guard are Angels of Providence on duty evermore”. Angels are there not only to comfort and protect individuals, but to maintain order and represent the good on earth. In other cases, angels play a similarly straightforward role as the representatives of God and His providence.  In The War Song to Englishmen, for example, “Th’ Angel of Fate turns them with mighty hands, / And casts them out upon the darken’d earth! … The arrows of Almighty God are drawn! / Angels of Death stand in the louring heavens!” Here they stand for divine strength and power.

Screen Shot 2021-05-10 at 10.39.26

The Problematic Angels: Angels of Experience 

Screen Shot 2021-11-24 at 11.57.21

“Here, the devil and the angel embody the contraries that characterise Blake’s poetry, contraries which become increasingly entangled and thought-provoking.” In this image, for instance, which exactly is the ‘good’ angel? Ostensibly it’s the one on the right, but fire in Blake is often associated with imaginative energy and liberty, which is here enchained – perhaps by the over-protectedness and purity of the ‘good’ angel. Perhaps both are a form or product of an inner dissociation.

These figures take on new meaning, however, in the poems of The Rosetti Manuscript, which span the middle decades of Blake’s career. The narrator tells of how he “heard an Angel singing / When the day was springing: / ‘Mercy, Pity, Peace / Is the world’s release”. The angel is answered by a cursing Devil, who refutes that “Mercy could be no more / If there was nobody poor, / And Pity no more could be, /If all were as happy as we”. In the final couplet, Blake concludes that “Misery’s increase / Is Mercy, Pity, Peace”. Although in this poem the angel remains a source of virtue and hope, his wish for mercy, pity and peace is boldly undermined by the logic of the devil, who demonstrates that such qualities can only exist alongside necessary evils. Here, the devil and the angel embody the contraries that characterise Blake’s poetry, contraries which become increasingly entangled and thought-provoking.

Another interaction between an angel and devil is recorded in one of the Memorable Fancys published in The Marriage of Heaven and Hell (1790-93):

Screen Shot 2021-11-24 at 12.20.02

The ‘angel’ program turns energy into serpents and demons.

Once I saw a Devil in a flame of fire, who arose before an Angel that sat on a cloud, and the Devil utter’d these words: – ‘The worship of God is: Honouring his gifts in other men, each according to his genius, and loving the greatest men best … The Angel hearing this became almost blue; but mastering himself he grew yellow, and at last white, pink, and smiling, and then replied: – ‘Thou Idolater! is not God One? … and are not all other men fools, sinners, and nothings?’ The Devil answer’d: … Jesus was all virtue, and acted from impulse, not from rules.’ When he had so spoken, I beheld the Angel, who stretched out his arms, embracing the flame of fire, and he was consumed, and arose as Elijah.

Screen Shot 2021-05-10 at 10.39.26

Note. This Angel, who is now become a Devil, is my particular friend. We often read the Bible together in its infernal or diabolical sense, which the world shall have if they behave well.

The angel initially balks at the devil’s suggestion that the divine is accessible to humankind through the talents and creations of great men. According to the devil, God’s universal and eternal wisdom does not make all men equal. Rather, those men who make use of their capacities, the poet who uses his genius to write an epic poem, for example, or the craftsman who harnesses his innate creativity to produce a fine piece of metalwork, cultivate the seed of divinity planted in mankind, through which we can best understand and worship God.

Screen Shot 2021-11-24 at 12.20.22

“I have always found that Angels have the vanity to speak of themselves as the only wise; this they do with a confident insolence sprouting from systematic reasoning”. Blake brilliantly and beautifully identifies the ‘angels’ of popular religion and culture not as glorious transcendent forces but sanctimonious, over-rationalistic small-minded puritans – the disembodied left brain computer programmers who run everything according to their own sterile and limiting algorithms.

Despite his colourful reaction, the angel is eventually won over by the devil’s argument, “embracing the flame of fire” and arising “as Elijah”. The poet explains that the angel “is now become a Devil” with whom he “often read[s] the Bible together in its infernal or diabolical sense”. To understand why Blake, by all accounts a man of faith, would put his own beliefs into the mouth of a devil, we need to look more closely at his spiritual position and his use of Biblical imagery.

The Marriage of Heaven and Hell is a unique text which combines poetry, prose and proverbs, and serves as Blake’s manifesto against traditional organised religion and his contempt towards its officials. Orthodox moral categories are subverted, and those who maintain them are criticised, including John Milton, of whom Blake said that “The reason [he] wrote in fetters when he wrote of Angels and God, and at liberty when of Devils and Hell, is because he was a true Poet, and of the Devil’s party without knowing it”. This striking statement exemplifies the complaint made by Blake throughout his writings, but particularly in this collection and in his prophetic books: he felt that Milton had allowed his poetic imagination to be prescribed and curtailed by orthodox morality, and had thus sacrificed the element of the divine within him.

Creativity and liberty, the freedom to create, are essential qualities without which mankind is suppressed and diminished; imagination is the divine spark in humans which dogmatic religious beliefs and practices threaten to extinguish. “I must Create a System, or be enslav’d by another Man’s. I will not Reason & Compare; my business is to Create”, Los declares in Jerusalem. Los is one of the principal characters in Blake’s mythical world, a blacksmith and founder of Golgonooza, the City of Imagination, who is thought to represent Blake himself.

Screen Shot 2021-05-10 at 10.39.26

Negative Angels: the Judgmental Moralisers and the Self-Righteous

Screen Shot 2021-11-24 at 12.22.54

“Angels are often used in his work to represent the adherents and agents of these restrictive forces”. Blake often gives these anti-angels Bat wings in his artwork, to denote their oppressive and reactionary origins and purpose.

For Blake, the greatest threats to the individual’s imagination and creativity were institutions and dogma, mainly religious ones but also social and political. Angels are often used in his work to represent the adherents and agents of these restrictive forces, as powerful figures working on behalf of a higher entity to implement its rules. In doing so, however, they crush any hope of individual liberty, divergence and development.

In William Bond, a poem from Blake’s first collection, the eponymous protagonist “went to church in a May morning, / Attended by Fairies, one, two, and three;  / But the Angels of Providence drove them away / And he return’d home in misery”. Here, the fairies are symbols of imagination, individuality and creativity, whereas the angels represent the repressive effects of organised religion, which continues to oppress William: “And an Angel of Providence at his feet, / And an Angel of Providence at his head, / And in the midst a black, black cloud, / And in the midst the sick man on his bed”. When eventually the fairies reappear at William’s sickbed, the angels are forced to leave.

The angels that appear in Blake’s poetry, while masquerading as bringers of virtue, are often devious and unscrupulous beneath their façade. In The Angel, one of the Songs of Experience that accompany and contrast the Songs of Innocence, a maiden Queen arms herself “with ten thousand shields and spears” against the angel which guarded her in her youth, but whom she seems to fear as she grows older. In I Asked a Thief, the narrator explains that, where he had failed with direct requests, an angel succeeded with subtlety and stealth:

Screen Shot 2021-11-24 at 12.13.28I askèd a thief to steal me a peach:

He turnèd up his eyes.

I ask’d a lithe lady to lie her down:

Holy and meek, she cries.

Screen Shot 2021-05-10 at 10.39.26

As soon as I went

An Angel came:

He wink’d at the thief,

And smil’d at the dame;

Screen Shot 2021-05-10 at 10.39.26

And without one word said

Had a peach from the tree,

And still as a maid

Enjoy’d the lady.

Another Memorable Fancy tells the story of a meeting between the Blakean narrator and an angel who offers him a glimpse of the hellish torment which was to be the punishment for his profane ideas. When the angel disappears, the scene vanishes too and “I found myself sitting on a pleasant bank beside a river, by moonlight, hearing a harper, who sung to the harp”. The speaker seeks out the angel and shows him his eternal lot: “in it were a number of monkeys, baboons, and all of that species, chain’d by the middle, grinning and snatching at one another, but withheld by the shortness of their chains. However, I saw that they sometimes grew numerous, and then the weak were caught by the strong, and with a grinning aspect, first coupled with, and then devour’d, by plucking off first one limb and then another, till the body was left a helpless trunk”. Here, the so-called angels are revealed for what they truly are: savage creatures restrained by chains but strong enough, when banded together, to oppress the smallest and weakest members of their group. This is how Blake see those who use the word of God to confine and control the individual who seeks his own path.

Screen Shot 2021-11-24 at 12.21.56

Thus in much of Blake’s weightier work, angels are not the dutiful messengers and servants of God, but deceptive schemers who would manipulate and exploit His word for their own gain, or out of their own misguided notions of right and wrong. They are the antithesis of the merciful angels who can be found in his other poems, guiding and guarding various characters.

To complicate the matter even further, the title of angel also appears to mark figures of exceptional strength or power, such as the thirteen angels in America: A Prophecy, who “threw their golden sceptres / Down on the land of America; indignant they descended / Headlong from out their heav’nly heights, descending swift as fires”. In such cases, the idea of the angel seems to bring with it no particular moral significance, but simply identifies the figure as a source of authority or force.

Screen Shot 2021-11-24 at 12.27.10

“Those who really believe in tyranny and work out a coherent defence of it clarify confusion into error and therefore demonstrate its opposite to be true.” Image: the rationalising Angel Richard Dawkins, the apostle of Urizen, who like Locke, Bacon and Newton helped clarify falsehood and therefore allowed it to be cast out: ‘to be an Error & to be Cast out is part of God’s design’

As Northrop Frye observes, “the real war in society is the ‘Mental Fight’ between the visionaries and the champions of tyranny. The latter are not the tyrants themselves but visionary renegades: poets like Virgil who write for Caesar; philosophers who ‘teach doubt & Experiment’; generalising painters like Titian and Rubens; theological apologists of Nobodaddy. As they are guardians of society and moral virtue, Blake cals them ‘Angels’; for this who, like himself, call the whole structure of society in question there is no word but ‘Devils.’ Angels, though wrong, are essential to imagination, for the reason given above, that the basis of tyranny is not error but confusion. Those who really believe in tyranny and work out a coherent defence of it clarify confusion into error and therefore demonstrate its opposite to be true. The uses to society of the Devil and the Angel, Blake says, are about equal, because ‘to be an Error & to be Cast out is part of God’s design.’  Hence there must be in society a continuous fight between radical and conservative imagination. ‘Without Contraries is no progression’, but this is the only kind of contrariety that can progress. Blake, in dealing with artists he considers Angels, lays about him with the destructive fury of a Friar John, without stopping to think whether he is being unfair to them or not. They can take care of themselves. Blake is engaged in ‘intellectual War’; he thinks of his state of Eden as an eternal Valhalla of conflicts waged with bows of burning gold and arrows of desire” (Fearful Symmetry).

Screen Shot 2021-11-24 at 20.34.18 (1)

For Blake, the true ‘Angels’ are non-judgemental – that’s why they are angels. Jesus was crucified by the judgers for not judging. His central doctrine was Forgiveness – the secret program that undoes all self-righteousness and accusation of sin, and therefore liberates us from self-division and returns us to Eden.

In his anti-Swedenborgian Marriage of Heaven and Hell, Blake’s Angels are therefore, satirically, the orthodox, “good” people, the contraries of the Devils, who are the unorthodox geniuses, the “evil” upsetters of established orders. For Blake, the true ‘Angels’ are non-judgemental – that’s why they are angels. We often call people “angels” without intending more than a compliment, but when Blake did so (as in his letter to Flaxman, 12 Sept 1800), he startles us by meaning it. He was writing about living people when he wrote: “It is not because Angels are Holier than Men or Devils that makes them Angels, but because they do not Expect Holiness from one another, but from God only. The Player is a liar when he says: ‘Angels are happier than Men because they are better.’ Angels are happier than Men & Devils because they are not always Prying after Good & Evil in one another & eating the Tree of Knowledge for Satan’s Gratification” (Vision of the Last Judgment). 

In that sense, the ultimate Negative Angel, or Judgmental Angel, is Satan. In the Bible, and in Blake, this type or anti-type is often referred to as the Angel of the Divine Presence, and in our current world this program or power is often mistaken for ‘God’, as Damon notes: “The Angel Of The Divine Presence is Satan. He appears in the presence of the Lord (Job i–ii); in Blake’s second illustration to Job, he is named and specified. He may take the form of an angel of light (II Cor ix:14), and is often mistaken for God. He provoked David to number his people (I Chron xxi:1). ‘The Aged Figure with Wings, having a writing tablet & taking account of the numbers who arise, is That Angel of the Divine Presence mention’d in Exodus, xiv c., 19 v. [as leading the Israelites into the Wilderness] & in other Places; this Angel is frequently call’d by the Name of Jehovah Elohim, The I am of the Oaks of Albion’ (Blake, Vision of the Last Judgment). In a watercolour, he writes the Decalogue, starting with ‘Yod,’ his own name and the first letter of the Divine Name. In the Laocoön plate, the central figure is labelled (in Hebrew) ‘King Jehovah,’ but immediately above, in smaller letters, Blake wrote in English ‘The Angel of the Divine Presence.’ The priest and his sons are entangled in the serpents of Good and Evil” (Damon, A Blake Dictionary).

Screen Shot 2021-11-24 at 20.44.15

Angel of the Divine Presence Bringing Eve to Adam (1803). Blake’s image suggests the beautiful coldness and purity of the ‘Angel of the Divine Presence’, one of the most enigmatic and disturbing figures in Blake’s work, and indeed in the Bible itself. As Damon notes, “The Angel of the Divine Presence is Satan. He may take the form of an angel of Light and is often mistaken for God.” He is linked with Purity, as Lucifer is with Light. Purity was one of the things Blake hated most: “thou wast so pure and bright/That Heaven was impure in thy sight”, he strikingly notes in ‘The Everlasting Gospel’. Lucifer’s sin was to think he was purer than God, which in many ways he was – as Blake repeatedly points out, God is not interested in purity. The obsession with purity is nothing to do with divinity, Blake suggests, but everything to do with self-righteousness and a sort of hyper-rationalising mindset (Urizen) that wants everything to be neat and tidy and clean and ordered, like machinery is – hence ‘Pure Reason’, ‘Pure Logic’ – and for whom the ultimate rational goal is a sort of mathematical purity. As Northrop Frye notes, “God is thus thought to be ‘pure’ goodness. Such a God could never have created Falstaff, to whom he would be vastly inferior.” As Blake notes, “In Hell all is Self Righteousness  there is no such thing there as Forgiveness of Sin. The Fool shall not enter into heaven let him be ever so Holy. Holiness is not The Price of Entrance into Heaven. The Last Judgment [will be] when all those are Cast away who trouble Religion with Questions concerning Good & Evil or Eating of the Tree of those Knowledges or Reasonings which hinder the Vision of God turning all into a Consuming fire” (Blake, Vision of Last Judgment). What we see in this Image (above) is the emergence of this process or program within the Human Brain – it is no coincidence that this Figure appears shortly after eating of the Tree of Good & Evil (ie of Self-Righteousness). Blake strikingly links this acquisition of naturalising Morality with the closing off of the divine vision, and its replacement by natural vision – ie with the belief in Materialism, and in the Material or Vegetative (Natural) Body: “Thou Angel of the Presence Divine,/ That didst create this Body of Mine”.

Screen Shot 2021-05-10 at 10.39.26

Complex Angels: Conclusions 

Screen Shot 2021-11-24 at 11.52.58

Angel or Devil? Angels are not fixed, as Blake’s story of his adversarial and moralising ‘Angel’ now becoming his understanding and friendly ‘devil’ in The Marriage of Heaven and Hell, testifies: in a dialectic or angel-riven world, such polar exchanges are both possible and inevitable. Here we see ‘Satan in his Original Glory’ (c. 1805). The figure of ‘Satan’ also exemplifies this mutability: originally a son of God, a luminous ‘Angel’, this form of energy changed its character when it sought to challenge ‘God’, for being less Pure and Rational than it was (the subtitle of Blake’s image is: ‘Thou wast Perfect till Iniquity was Found in Thee’). The angel fell; but it can potentially ‘rise’ again, and become a forgiving and reasonable program, if it accepts that it is not the Master but merely the Emissary within the Human Brain.

The multiplicity of meaning contained within this one symbol epitomises the complex and often confusing poetry of William Blake. He demands that we be alert to subtle changes and pay thoughtful attention to context, as his symbols do not reliably correspond to a single referent but depend on the way and place in which they are used. Blake’s poetry is not for the passive reader, but to the active it offers a rich stock of emotions, meanings and ideas that can keep one reading, and guessing, for a lifetime.

In fact, Blake himself spent much of his life contemplating the mystery of angels. When he was eight years old, he claimed that he had had a vision while out walking with his mother in Peckham: he saw a tree filled with angels, their luminescent wings shining like stars from its boughs. The boy was heartily cuffed for telling such tall tales, but the punishment did not prevent him documenting many other similar visions. Blake continued to have such experiences throughout his life, conversing directly with divine figures such as Gabriel and a number of other Arch-angels, who he claimed not only instructed him to write his great works, but also enjoyed reading them! Lying on his deathbed in his London home in 1827, Blake sketched the portrait of his beloved and committed wife, Catherine. Shortly after finishing the drawing, he uttered his final words: “You have ever been an angel to me!”

This is an edited version of Angels in the Poetry of William Blake by Mia Forbes. To read the full article, please click here

Screen Shot 2021-11-24 at 18.46.59

 

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s