Fearful Symmetry: Blake and the Symbolism of the Left Brain, by Iain McGilchrist

TygerTyger: The Predators, the Single Eye, and the Pyramids within our Heads

Screenshot 2022-01-19 at 18.50.17

THE-LH_tiger-roaring-face-abstract-HD

Screenshot 2021-12-28 at 17.07.52-THIS 2

Screen Shot 2021-05-10 at 10.39.26

Introduction: Symbols and Symptoms

In 2014, the psychiatrist and philosopher Iain McGilchrist gave a remarkable talk on the art and symbolism of patients with schizophrenia or psychosis (‘Neuromania – Spiders, yes, but why cats?‘). The presentation was not only a fascinating insight into the nature of these conditions, and the implicit and intrinsic connections between symptoms and symbols, but also a profound exploration of the peculiar symbolism and imagery that more generally surrounds us in our supposedly hyper-rational cultures, and which artist and writer William Blake somehow understood and drew upon.

Screenshot 2022-01-16 at 15.08.49

Groddeck’s remarkable The Book of the It (1923)

As pioneering psychologist Georg Groddeck noted, “the sickness is also a symbol, a representation of something going on within, a drama staged by the It [das Es], by means of which it announces what it could not say with the tongue” (The Book Of The It).  

Symptom and symbol become almost interchangeable in this world of manifestation and self-realisation.  Indeed, Groddeck often refers to “the symbol-making It”, observing that “the It cannot help but symbolize”. Groddeck’s theories of the “It” or “Id” profoundly influenced Freud, who formulated the much more Urizenic notion of the “id” as a threatening and destabilising force within our minds, rather than a spontaneous, hyper-aware, and potentially liberating and empowering (healing) energy resisting the forces of the repressive, over-rationalising egoic Selfhood. Both symptoms and symbols, for Groddeck, were ways for this underlying, imaginative reality or language to communicate itself, a way to “give Error a form”, as Blake put it.

McGilchrist explores this innate symbol-making propensity in patients with schizophrenia (a condition which interestingly mimics, as he observes, “right hemisphere damage” and in which “the right frontal lobe is underactive”). His discussion notes the remarkable recurrence of the symbol of the single Detached Eye, for example, in the artwork of this group, as well as their visual and psychological attraction towards the symbolism of cats/tigers, burning forests, pyramids, and sun-like “rays”. “Cats have a fascination for schizophrenic subjects”, observes McGilchrist, perhaps representing “the more ruthless and Machiavellian aspects of our nature”. He points to the striking commonalities between these paintings from schizophrenic subjects, and speculates on the ways in which they support claims about the two hemispheres and their functions, and indeed how they might relate to and be expressive of wider culture.

Screenshot 2022-01-16 at 15.14.47

Example of the astonishing artwork of David Chick, a patient with schizophrenia, with a curiously floating single Eye in the top right corner. As McGilchrist observes, these very striking detached ‘Eyes’ are a recurrent and spontaneous feature of patients with schizophrenia in their art. He notes not only the beauty of the image and the presence of this observing Eye, but also the “morbid geometricity” of the composition, and the linear “rays” seemingly emanating from the “sun”. Also “the fact that the character seems to be changing sex”, and the apparent “depthlessness” of the whole image, a sort of curious “two-dimensional” representation of reality. These are all features, remarkably, of the iconography and symbolism commonly associated with a number of influential “spiritual” traditions – such as in Gnostic, Masonic, and Hermetic imagery and iconography, including the depictions and artwork associated with Akhenaten in classic Egyptian culture, who shifted his whole culture towards worship of exactly this sort of “ray-like” sun (called the Aten, after which he was named).

In terms of symbolism and symbolisation, “the disembodied Eye”, McGilchrist remarks, “is probably the single commonest finding in patients with schizophrenia”, though he also notes the striking appearance, and frequent reiteration, of the “Pyramid” as a symbol or focus of attention in psychotic subjects.

His whole talk, drawing on a rich combination of neurological, cultural, psychological, and aesthetic frameworks, is revelatory, and essential for anyone trying to understand the appearance of these symbols in various esoteric and “religious” traditions and iconography – from orthodox Christianity and the cultural symbolism of ancient Egypt to the iconography of the Enlightenment and the esoteric symbolism of the American dollar bill – the most widely circulated of modern symbols, as he notes. 

Screenshot 2022-01-16 at 15.25.50

Screenshot 2022-01-16 at 15.26.27

Screenshot 2022-01-16 at 15.27.10

Screenshot 2022-01-16 at 15.42.31

justin-bieber-moms-eye-tattoo-selfie-ig

Screenshot 2022-01-16 at 15.34.11

Living in a Left-Brain World: in our post-Babylonian culture, the symbolism of the hyper-active left brain is dominant and ubiquitous. This marks, and is expressive of, the dramatic shift from a previous right brain/whole brain way of seeing (what McGilchrist terms the “Master”) to a Urizenic, left-brain dominant one (that of the “Emissary”, who now assumes the “God” role within the human brain). Images (from top): The single detached Eye in Pontormo’s Supper at Emmaus (1525); the top of Jean-Jacques-François Le Barbier’s 1789 depiction of The Declaration of the Rights of Man; the same single eye and triangle on the reverse of the Great Seal of the United States, as seen on the U.S. $1 bill; the famous Masonic symbolism (with Urizen’s golden compasses, forming another triangle; and note the rays of light); the arms and bodies of our left-brain celebrity culture become a living advertising board for this sort of schizophrenic thinking or self-representation, as in Justin Beiber’s ink (note also the burning Lion); and Single Eyes and Pyramids are everywhere to be found in the videos and iconography of modern ‘pop’ stars such as Lady Gaga, Rhianna, and Katy Perry. They serve to reinforce the control of the left hemisphere on our imaginations and way of thinking about reality: detached, controlled, hyper-rationalising, hierarchical, and kept unconscious.

Screen Shot 2021-05-10 at 10.39.26

The Visionary Arsonist: William Blake, Jonathan Martin, and the Burning Forest

Perhaps of particular interest in relation to Blake is McGilchrist’s discussion of the artwork of Jonathan Martin (1782–1838), the brother of the famous nineteenth-century artist John Martin, and someone who frequently heard voices – one of which in 1829 told him to burn down York Minster church, which he duly did (note the theme of burning fire, here literalised), and was promptly put into the Bedlam asylum. There he drew and painted extraordinary – and extraordinarily Blakean – pictures filled with burning tigers and lions, strikingly symmetrical faces, detached hands and eyes, and swirling, spiralling serpents, suggesting some sort of deep nexus or psychological patterning within the mind, connecting all of these features.

Below are four of Martin’s artworks, next to strikingly similar images in Blake’s work:

Screenshot 2022-01-16 at 16.41.41

Screenshot 2022-01-16 at 16.42.57

Screenshot 2022-01-16 at 16.43.41

Screenshot 2022-01-16 at 16.45.03

Forests of the night: Images (from top): Martin’s England Prepare to Meet Thy God next to Blake’s The Sick Rose (note also the unusual combination of text and image in both); Martin’s The Lambton Worm and Self Portrait and Blake’s The Angel Michael Binding Satan (“He Cast him into the Bottomless Pit, and Shut him up”) (note the subjection of the repressed bodily and imaginative energy with which the holy, rationalising, disembodied left brain psyche sees itself now at war); Martin’s My Dream of My Foot Cut Of and Blake’s Dante and Virgil Penetrating the Forest (note the lions/tygers leaping through the forest, which seems to be on fire with energy); and Martin’s The Likeness of My Father and Blake’s The Man Who Taught Blake Painting in his Dreams (note the prominence of the foreheads – of the brain – in both; and also the lion with a crown on its head, and Martin’s striking title for the image, which suggests perhaps a deeper, more Freudian, reading of the anti-authoritarian impulse in both artists).

Martin’s artwork, like that of many subjects with schizophrenia, displays a highly unusual and distinctive (and again very Blakean) combination of text intruding onto images. Indeed, as McGilchrist suggests, this spontaneous combination of text and image is historically quite unusual in art, except in the artwork of subjects with schizophrenia.

Blake’s images are remarkable not only for giving such astonishing form to such visions and mental states, but for his own ability to distance himself from them (unlike say, Jonathan Martin – the difference being in part that Blake was in control of his visions – they weren’t in control of him).  I am not therefore suggesting that Blake was schizophrenic – he seems to have been, in many respects, unusually sane and integrated – as one contemporary recalled of him, “I saw nothing but sanity” (Mr Calvert, cited by Gilchrist in his early Life of William Blake). What makes Blake’s works and thinking so compelling is precisely his remarkable understanding of the mental structures and processes that lay behind these disturbed ways of thinking, without however succumbing to them – indeed it is his understanding of them that allows him to stand back from them, and depict them so vividly and forcefully.

Screen Shot 2021-04-08 at 16.31.42

“He who sees the Ratio only sees himself only” – the self-enclosed “hall of mirrors”, as McGilchrist describes this self-reflexive, “virtual” aspect of the left hemisphere. Image: Blake’s Newton (c. 1795–1805). Note the single eye of Newton, the Urizenic triangular compasses, the narrow focused attention. It was this mode of seeing that would transform the world under industrial capitalism into its own image. Blake saw it coming.

In that sense he was in many ways the first psychoanalyst – as Foster Damon remarks, “I do think it extremely likely that the name of Blake the psychologist will figure in the history of science, as well as in the histories of literature, art, and philosophy.” In particular, Blake saw how these damaging processes and activities were not only experienced individually and subjectively, but also culturally and globally – in the forms of global mental collapse and disintegration that he witnessed in the practices of contemporary industrial capitalism and Newtonian science, driven as they were by a pathological form of exactly this type of schizophrenic instrumental reasoning (see Duffell, Wounded Leaders: British Elitism and the Entitlement Illusion—A Psychohistory, 2014).

It is perhaps significant in this context that McGilchrist defines schizophrenia as not a loss of “reason” so much as a form of excessive rationality. “‘To lose one’s reason’ is the old expression for madness”, he notes. “But an excess of rationality is the grounds of another kind of madness, that of schizophrenia” (The Master and his Emissary). Certain forms of madness such as schizophrenia are thus characterised “by an excessively detached, hyper-rational, reflexively self-aware, disembodied and alienated condition” in which “one’s own body becomes no longer the vehicle through which reality is experienced, but instead it is seen as just another object, sometimes a disturbingly alien object”, in a world full of other “devitalised machines”. This stance is, he observes, strikingly similar to the basis of the Cartesian philosophy.

Screenshot 2022-01-16 at 17.06.00

Self-portrait of a person with schizophrenia, representing that individual’s distorted perception of reality. Note the machine-like way the subject suffering from schizophrenia understands and sees their body. Today you have to be either a schizophrenic or a materialist scientist to adopt this view of the world. As McGilchrist notes, “it is significant that the ‘normal’ scientific materialist view of the body is similar to that found in schizophrenia. Schizophrenic subjects routinely see themselves as machines— often robots, computers, or cameras—and sometimes declare that parts of them have been replaced by metal or electronic components”.

Indeed, McGilchrist characterises this rather abstract and abstracting stance of “an excessively detached, hyper-rational, reflexively self-aware, disembodied and alienated condition” as being common to both schizophrenic thinking and post-Enlightenment philosophy, the intellectual or psychological framework for modernity. As he observes, the “conscious effort to distance oneself from one’s surroundings, refrain from normal action and interaction with them, suspend one’s normal assumptions and feelings about them and subject them to a detached scrutiny” is “an exercise which in the non-mentally ill is normally confined to philosophers”. Blake would probably have agreed:

Till a Philosophy of Five Senses was complete
Urizen wept & gave it into the hands of Newton & Locke

The Song of Los

McGilchrist concludes that this form of excessive hyper-rationality, the characteristic of certain types of extreme psychosis, is the hallmark not only of subjects with schizophrenia but of modern culture itself: “Both schizophrenia and the modern condition, I suggest, deal with the same problem: a free-wheeling left hemisphere.” We are bound within and to this free-wheeling power, not merely through philosophy but through symbols, which work on a far deeper level on us. Hence the ubiquity of such symbols in our supposedly secular and “Enlightenment” modern age.

Screen Shot 2021-05-10 at 10.39.26

Hell’s Gates: Entering the Domain of Fallen Reason

The image below is from Jonathan Martin; it is called “Hell’s Gates”.

ldbth756-hells-gates-1830-b-Jonathan Martin was confined in the Criminal Lunatic Department of Bethlem Hospital from 1829-1838, following his attempt to burn down York Minster

Perhaps one of the chief aspects or affects of this picture is anger. Roaring. And this is of significance as anger is the one emotion that consistently lateralizes to the left hemisphere of the brain, as McGilchrist explains: “Anger is robustly connected with left frontal activation. Aggression is motivating and dopamine plays a crucial role in the rewards it offers.” We can perhaps witness this activation here: a storm of fury, a rage to conquer and destroy, to control.

But equally striking in Martin’s drawings and artwork are images of ratios, symmetries, control – as if all this anger was being harnessed and rationalised, but was also, at heart, predatory and indeed rather psychopathic. In this, Martin’s Hell’s Gate, with its huge devouring lion, resembles Blake’s many depictions of the ‘Red Dragon’, the final form – or ‘logical conclusion’ as it were – of Urizen, the glorious former Son of God, Lucifer –  revealed ultimately as a relentless, devouring, wanting (empty) program, characterised by ferocious and destructive anger as well as cunning manipulation.

The more purely rational Reason becomes, if you like, the more monstrous its manipulative and calculating nature emerges and is manifest. Until, Blake observes, it becomes finally its contemporary form, “the Dragon Urizen”: “the Dragon form of Urizen” (J 14:3, p. 158; FZ Night the Ninth).

Screenshot 2022-01-16 at 17.22.31

The Progress of the Left Hemisphere: from glorious Emissary to devouring Dragon. Images: (left): Satan in his Original Glory (c. 1805); (right): The Great Red Dragon and the Woman Clothed in Sun (c. 1803-5). Here, Blake is showing not only the historical and psychological ‘fall’ of this program, but as it were the front (conscious) and back (unconscious aspect) of it – how it thinks of itself, and how it truly is. It is this power that has controlled most of recorded human history, and therefore our brains, for 6000 years: from the cunning, rationalising Enki in Sumerian legends to Apollo, Lucifer and the Aten, from the rationalising luminous Logos to the solar Gods of Newton, Bacon and Locke in the age of the left-brain’s final “En-lightenment” – what McGilchrist refers to as “the triumph of the left hemisphere”.

Interestingly, McGilchrist himself also talks about Blake in this context, noting the striking words used in the first stanza of Blake’s famous poem about the Tyger, in which all these symbols appear: burning, forests, symmetry, eye, hand, bright, fearful  – and all of which are to be found in Martin’s artwork, and indeed in much of the artwork done by schizophrenic subjects. The schizophrenic mind seems to be honing in on these images, expressive of its mode of being or way of seeing the world, or way of being in the world.

Screenshot 2022-01-16 at 17.29.05

It is also striking how often these images of predators (tigers, lions, jaguars) recur in post-Babylonian cultures, often associated with elite power and control. They are frequently to be found on many royal emblems and coats of arms, and stand watch in front of numerous financial, military, and political institutions and establishments. They are signs and emblems of the type of psyche within them.

Journalist Jon Ronson provides a fascinating insight into the psychic role and function of such predatory symbols in his study of Al Dunlap, the former CEO of Sunbeam Corp, a major transnational American electronics firm (note the presence of the “sunbeams” or rays again in the name – modern corporate logos showing suns with linear “rays” are too numerous to mention). At Sunbeam, Dunlop was responsible for what was then “the largest jump in New York Stock Exchange history”: profits soared amid a mass of redundancies (and, as was later discovered, massive fraud) – the sort of “rationalisation” that the 1980s and 90s were so famous for, ushering in modern neoliberalism. Ronson visited Dunlap in his lavish Florida mansion, as part of his research for his 2011 book The Psychopath Test. He noticed the unusually large number of ferocious sculptures of predatory animals filling the beautifully manicured lawns. “‘Lions,’ said Al Dunlap, showing me around”:

Lions. Jaguars. Lions. Always predators. Predators. Predators. Predators. I have a great belief in and a great respect for predators. Everything I did I had to go make happen.’

Screen Shot 2021-05-10 at 10.39.26

Item 5:Cunning/manipulativeI wrote in my reporter’s notepad.‘His statements may reveal a belief that the world is made up of “predators and prey”, or that it would be foolish not to exploit weaknesses in others.’

‘Gold too,’ I said. ‘There’s a lot of gold here too.’   

Ronson’s observations are salutary in reminding us of how ubiquitous this predatory and pathological behaviour is in our culture. We become almost blasé about the terrifying number of lions and jaguars foisted upon our societies, as their emblems. The connections between the inner and the outer, between the economic practices and the underlying pathologies, strike Ronson as being potentially profound. “It’s a frightening and huge thought,” he mentions to Martha Stout of the Harvard Medical School, “that the ninety-nine per cent of us wandering around down here are having our lives pushed and pulled around by that psychopathic fraction up there.” “Yes,” she replies. “The higher you go up the ladder the greater the number of sociopaths you’ll find there” (The Psychopath Test).

Interestingly, just as schizophrenia is a condition characterised by right hemisphere damage and under-activity (and a correspondingly hyperactive left hemisphere), so too psychopathy, as McGilchrist notes, also seems to be rooted in profound right hemisphere deficits, resembling brain damage: “Psychopaths, who have no sense of guilt, shame or responsibility, have deficits in the right frontal lobe, particularly the right ventromedial and orbitofrontal cortex.” It is these types of peope who our culture and economy relentlessly promotes and rewards.

Screenshot 2022-01-16 at 17.38.08

Al Dunlap, who earned the nickname “Chainsaw Al” for eliminating thousands of jobs before getting the ax himself as chief executive of Sunbeam Corp. His strategy was simple — “Cut, cut, and then cut some more!” In the 90s he was larger than life and lionised – to use an appropriate term – by the financial world, and his quotes were studied in the US business schools. These types run our worlds, as Robert Hare, one of the world’s leading authorities into psychopathy and the originator of the widely accepted “Hare Checklist”, observed. “I shouldn’t have done my research just in prisons,” he remarked. “I should have spent some time inside the Stock Exchange as well”. “But surely stock-market psychopaths can’t be as bad as serial-killer psychopaths,” Ronson responds. “‘Serial killers ruin families,’ shrugged Bob. ‘Corporate and political and religious psychopaths ruin economies. They ruin societies’.”  As Martha Stout acutely notes of such types: “They love winning. If you take loving kindness out of the human brain there’s not much left except the will to win”. This is the “Dragon” form of Urizenic rationalisation that currently drives modern capitalism: it is not a system based on empathy, compassion, or cooperation.

Screenshot 2022-01-16 at 18.27.50

Note the lions, the gold, the pyramidic hand symbol, the predatory psyche, the underlying anger within Trump (as within so many presidents and prime-minsters; the boardrooms of huge financial multinationals such as HSBC are also often swathed in anger). We live within symbols, and they unconsciously and implicitly form our words and our worlds.

Screen Shot 2021-05-10 at 10.39.26

Ray of Light: The Externalised, Controlling God

Screenshot 2022-01-16 at 17.09.20

‘The Influencing Machine’, a drawing by Jakob Mohr (c. 1910), who underwent much psychiatric treatment. Note the ray-like lines, and the general sense of being “influenced” or controlled by an unknown, external agency, exactly as Daniel Paul Schreber describes. To the Enlightenment “mechanical” philosophy (which had reduced everything to machines and matter), the whole experience of intersubjective “influence” or personal intuition (arising from the embodied, imaginative unconscious) becomes profoundly uncanny.

McGilchrist notes the frequent belief amongst psychotic or schizophrenic subjects “that there are rays that are controlling them” – rays which are often drawn as long straight lines, emanating from the sun. He refers, for example, to the curious, linear solar lines that are described by Daniel Paul Schreber, the fascinating case study of Freud’s only treatment of psychosis (Psycho-Analytic Notes on an Autobiographical Account of a Case of Paranoia (Dementia Paranoides), 1911). McGilchrist links these strange, emanating geometries to the belief in a sort of “puppet master” who must be controlling things, from above – a fascinating insight which perhaps links to contemporary conspiracy theory debates or the existence of the “Illuminati”, helping to explain contemporary political and social behaviour as both being manifestations of hyper-left brain phenomena or anxieties.

This idea comes from the feeling of not owning your own actions, not owning your own self – a lack of what Louis Sass calls ‘ipseity’ – the feeling of the automatic intuition that one is who one is – once it becomes alien from this, and starts to examine itself as an object in the world alongside other objects. And if one is not in control of oneself, who is in control? It must be a puppet master. (McGilchrist, ‘Neuromania’)

This unnerving sense of being controlled or observed recurs in representations of “the obvious observing Eye, which I think again represents a sense of being observed by something, or controlled by something – one doesn’t know what – which is presumably parts of the mind which is not conscious” (i.e., parts of the mind which have been forced underground, to become “not conscious”, due to its repressive, rationalising agency, and which now seems to act in a mysterious way upon it – exactly as in Freud’s theory in fact). McGilchrist links this rather paranoid sense or condition with schizophrenia as being “not a lack of reasoning; it is in fact a hypertrophy of rationality, in which everything that is intuitively understood has to be painfully and laboriously reasoned out from first principles”.

Screenshot 2022-01-16 at 11.26.32

Screenshot 2022-01-16 at 11.27.11

Quicker than a ray of light: Above: Akhenaten, Nefertiti, and their three children blessed by the Aten (Solar Disk), mid-14th century BCE.  Below: Akhenaten as a Sphinx. Note the resemblance to the earlier image by David Chick, including the rays, the solar focus, the rays ending in hands (a key body part for the left hemisphere, enabling it to literally “manipulate” reality – the left hemisphere controls the right hand), the elongated face, the curiously male-female body (here also with a lion/cat head), and the typically foreshortened and two-dimensional perspective of the main figure.

This correlation (or mis-correlation) between the so-called ‘conscious’ and ‘unconscious’ aspects of the mind is surely fascinating, and a central aspect not only of all of our waking minds (within this Urizenic system), but of how symbolism itself operates. Freud famously declared that “the ego is not master in its own house” (A Difficulty in the Path of Psycho-Analysis, 1917) – a sense here again of the rational, “conscious” mind being somehow “controlled’ or influenced from afar.

But this story, to adapt an observation of Blake’s, has been adopted by both parties. For in many ways it is not that the egoic, conscious mind has a sense of being controlled by something unconscious or alien – rather, the conscious mind is itself deeply unconscious (is “asleep”, as Blake would say) – and yet thinks it’s conscious – which might perhaps give rise to these odd symbols, or sensations, of itself – rather like trying to catch a glimpse of yourself in a mirror which is always just out of sight.

Screenshot 2022-01-16 at 15.57.14

The single eye fascinated Surrealists, with its threshold position between the inner self and the external world – shown here in René Magritte’s The False Mirror (1929). The Surrealist photographer Man Ray summarised the uncanniness of the disembodied eye best when he said that Magritte’s The False Mirror “sees as much as it itself is seen.” This is its job – like the Covering Cherub: to stop us from looking through it, or questioning it – to stop us seeing behind its curtain, from being aware of it.

So we’re in a sense imaginatively asleep, and have this curious sense that this ‘conscious’ state is not the whole picture; the detached Eye seems to both suggest another dimension, but equally acts as a sort of Guardian to prevent us from entering it, or perhaps from seeing it – the Eye always looks outwards, at us.

Freud himself referred to the existence within what he intriguingly called the “two rooms” of the mind of a sort of “Watchman” figure, guarding or hindering the passage between them.

On the threshold between these two rooms a watchman performs his function: he examines the different mental impulses, acts as a censor, and will not admit them into the drawing-room if they displease him … It is the same watchman whom we get to know as resistance when we try to lift the repression by means of the analytic treatment. (Freud, Introductory Lectures on Psycho-Analysis)

Freud’s hypothesis of the watchman brilliantly captures the nature of the left hemispheric observer who guards access into consciousness (the deeper dimensions of the mind), an agency or activity that constantly examines, censors, watches, analyses, judges, and “performs his function”. It is the watchman, Freud notes, “whom we get to know” as the prime agent of resistance and repression; and it is, contrariwise, the unconscious right hemisphere with its much more open, freer, and less judgmental stance that the therapist must try to engage for successful treatment to occur – ie to get beyond the watchman, the single Eye.

Screenshot 2022-01-16 at 18.34.08

The Covering Cherub/Watchman: “For the cherub with his flaming sword is hereby commanded to leave his guard at tree of life, and when he does, the whole creation will be consumed, and appear infinite and holy whereas it now appears finite & corrupt.” This will signal a shift of perspective back from the left to the right.

Freud’s comments regarding the “watchman” have fascinating similarities with what Gazzaniga has more recently termed the left brain “interpreter” (see for example ‘Brain and Conscious Experience’, 2002). “There is a specialised left hemisphere system we have designated as the ‘interpreter’,” he notes – a highly advanced and specialised critical and interpretive structure (hence its name). This left hemispheric interpreter “constructs theories to assimilate perceived information” according to internal, self-consistent theories, and acts to reject any information or experience that might disrupt this internal logic. “The left hemisphere’s capacity for continual interpretation” observes Gazzaniga, “suggests that it is always looking for order and reason, even where there is none”.

It seems to be this watchman or interpreter that acts as both a censor and a guard for egoic consciousness. Thus, as Freud notes, “in investigating resistance, we have learnt that it emanates from forces of the ego” – that is to say, repression does not emanate from the (right brain) unconscious, but from the apparently “conscious”, left brain system. The conscious mind is not however aware of doing this, hence the rather curious situation in which the apparently conscious mind generates the (repressed) unconscious due to its own unconsciousness. Bypassing the watchman is both difficult and dangerous: Freud repeatedly notes how immensely fraught this seemingly simple procedure is, and how deeply resistant the conscious, explicit self is to both change and self-knowledge.

McGilchrist also mentions the Eye of Horus in this context of the all-observing single Eye, in ways that are particularly thought-provoking in relation to what Blake termed “Single Vision” – the way of seeing the world in terms of Urizenic measurement, in terms of an apparently rational, conscious (or “solar”) mind, and in terms of the domineering left brain: “the Eye of Horus was the basis of the beginnings of geometry and measurement” he remarks (the ideogram for the Eye of Horus being made up of mathematical symbols, which together constituted his “Eye”). This new geometrical, rationalising mode of attention signalled the ascendancy within the human brain of the peculiar and particular new egoic “solar” consciousness with its striking, single, Eye” (Tweedy, The God of the Left Hemisphere, 2012).

Screenshot 2022-01-16 at 12.12.11

“Artistically, the Eye is comprised of six different parts. From the mythological standpoint, each part of the Eye is considered to be an individual symbol. Additionally, parts of the Eye represent terms in the series 1/2, 1/4, 1/8, 1/16, and 1/32; when this image is superimposed upon a sagittal image of the human brain, it appears that each part corresponds to the anatomic location of a particular human sensorium” (see The Eye of Horus: The Connection Between Art, Medicine, and Mythology in Ancient Egypt, 2019). This ‘eye’ motif is actually a hybrid of a human and falcon or “hawk” eye (hawks being birds of prey, associated with the sun, and therefore the aerial form of the solar lion-predator type). According to ancient Egyptian mythology, the god-King Horus (often depicted as a falcon, or with a falcon’s head) lost one of his eyes in a battle with his uncle Set. This story of a foundational “god” who loses one of his “eyes” (hemispheres) recurs throughout Western (post-Babylonian) culture. It marks the story of the triumph and dominance of the left hemisphere’s – and only the left hemisphere’s – way of “seeing”.

Depictions of all these symbols of a newly dominant, hyper-active left brain – the predators, the detached and detaching eye, the geometric pyramids – fill our culture and our lines of sight – and therefore our heads. They constitute the ideological templates for how we see reality – or rather, how we are meant to see reality, according to this newly dominant Program within our brains.

McGilchrist notes the surprising number of spontaneous depictions of Egyptian pyramids, for example, even in poor, working class patients with schizophrenia or psychosis living in south London in the nineteenth century – who had presumably never actually seen a pyramid or a lion, and yet whose minds were spontaneously filled with them, as part of the peculiar disruptions and dissociation to their brains. He notes that, historically and culturally, such “pyramids start to appear, along with the Eye, in the Reformation” – when “the left hemisphere begins its comeback, if you like” – he shows the Pontormo painting of Christ (see image above) with both the single eye and pyramid, painted in the early Renaissance as illustrative of this shift – and interestingly observes that the parts of God’s anatomy that tend to get represented in art of this period “are the Eye and the Hand” – both very left hemispheric in their associations (the grasping, manipulating hand; the detaching and observing mode of attention of the new “Holy Reasoning Power”, as Blake describes the Urizenic power now in charge) and both body parts represented, usually, as being detached and disembodied – “things that point and control”.

Screenshot 2022-01-16 at 18.57.54

Eye Am: The single, observing, detached, floating Eye is not only the ‘symbol’ for the detached left hemispheric consciousness, but also the means by which it secures its dominance within culture. It keeps an eye on us – an esoteric and global Big Brother, Superego function. It makes us appear that we are “within” Nature, within a closed, natural, solar world of ratios and fractions. As McGilchrist remarks, the detached single eye “is the left hemisphere, inspecting”.

McGilchrist repeatedly links these as symbols also of the so-called “Enlightenment” – the final dominance of the left hemisphere over the right – and symptomatic of “what you would expect if there was an over-drive of the left hemisphere and an under-drive, if you like, of the right hemisphere”.  

Watch the full talk here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CkVwGpOXhf8

Rod Tweedy, PhD, is the author of The God of the Left Hemisphere: Blake, Bolte Taylor and the Myth of Creation (Routledge, 2013), a study of Blake’s work in the light of modern neuroscience; the editor of The Political Self: Understanding the Social Context for Mental Illness (Routledge, 2017), and the editor of The Divided Therapist: Hemispheric Difference and Contemporary Psychotherapy (Routledge, 2021). He is also an active supporter of Veterans for Peace UK and and the user-led mental health organisation, Mental Fight Club.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s